Detect the differences: Cultural Heritage survey, documentation and interpretation for conservation activities
Abstract
The actual greater diffusion of advanced surveying and representation tools, increasingly user friendly, represent an advantage in terms of cultural heritage digitizing and knowledge sharing, but it requires a series of consideration on the quality of the procedures adopted and the possibility of qualitatively and quantitatively evaluating the results obtained.
Surveying means knowing and understanding the existing, in its geometric-morphological-constructive specificities; the different methods and tools of data acquisition must be chosen with the objective of documenting and representing the real geometries, ensuring that recognition of the differences between the stratified elements, which represents the first moment of diagnostic analysis of the historical asset. Only graphical elaborations made according to these criteria, with levels of detail according to the different scales of representation, can usefully become support for conservation project and management of restoration processes.
The characteristics of uniqueness and complexity of each historic building require an ad hoc design of the survey activities, tools and methodologies to be adopted, and of the forms and scales of representation. Nonetheless, it is possible to identify a general workflow of the surveying activities in order to obtain data that could be geometrically reliable, quantitatively controllable, comparable and repeatable over time.
This paper aims to make a series of considerations about these questions, starting from the analysis of case studies addressed in recent years.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20365/disegnarecon.31.2023.19
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andrews, D., Bedford, J. & Bryan, P. (2015). Metric Survey Specifications for Cultural Heritage (3rd edn), Guidance. London: Historic England.
Barazzetti, L., Previtali, M. & Roncoroni, F. (2022). Subsidence Monitoring in the Duomo di Milano: half a century of measuring activities. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Piñeira Mantiñán, M.J. (eds). (2022) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (vol 482). Cham: Springer.
Barazzetti, L., Banfi, F., Brumana, R., Previtali, M. & Roncoroni, F. (2016). Integrated modeling and monitoring of the medieval bridge azzone visconti. In Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2016). Bilbao, 5-8.
Banfi, F. (2017). BIM orientation: grades of generation and information for different type of analysis and management process. In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W5, 57–64.
Banfi, F., Roascio, S., Paolillo, F.R., Previtali, M., Roncoroni, F. & Stanga, C. (2022). Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis for Knowledge Creation: Architectural Representation Geared to XR Building Archaeology (Claudius-Anio Novus Aqueduct in Tor Fiscale, the Appia Antica Archaeological Park). In Energies, 15, 4598.
Banfi, F., Brumana, R., Landi, A.G., Previtali, M., Roncoroni & F., Stanga, C. (2022). Building archaeology informative modelling turned into 3D volume stratigraphy and extended reality time-lapse communication. In Virtual Archaeology Review, 13, pp. 1-21.
Brusaporci, S., Maiezza & P., Tata, A. (2020). Advanced Heritage: From the Virtual Copy to a Virtuous Image of Reality. In Proceedings of the 2nd International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Image and Imagination. IMG 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1140. Cham: Springer.
Carbonara, G. (1990). Restauro dei monumenti. Guida agli elaborati grafici. Roma: Liguori.
Daniotti, B., Gianinetto, M. & Della Torre, S. (2020). Digital Transformation of the Design, Construction and Management Processes of the Built Environment. Research for Development. Cham: Springer.
Della Torre, S., Mirarchi, C. & Pavan, A. (2017). Il BIM per la conservazione. Rappresentare e gestire la conoscenza. In Ananke, 80, 108-115.
Historic England (2016). Drawing for Understanding. Creating Interpretive Drawings of Historic Buildings. London:
ICOMOS (1964). International Venice Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites. 2nd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments. Venice. , from https://www.icomos.org/en/participer/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/157-thevenice-charter.
ICOMOS (1990). Guide to recording historic buildings. International Council on Monuments and Sites. London: Butterworlh Architecture.
Letellier, R., Schmid, W. & LeBlanc, F. (2007). Recording, Documentation, and Information Management for the Conservation of Heritage Places: Guiding Principles. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Conservation Institute, from http://hdl.handle.net/10020/gci_pubs/recordim
Oreni, D., Brumana, R., Della Torre, S., Banfi, F., Barazzetti & L., Previtali, M. (2014). Survey turned into HBIM: the restoration and the work involved concerning the Basilica di Collemaggio after the earthquake (L’Aquila). In ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II, 267–273.
Parrinello, S. & Dell’Amico, A. (2021). From Survey to Parametric Models: HBIM Systems for Enrichment of Cultural Heritage Management. In: Bolognesi, C., Villa, D. (eds) From Building Information Modelling to Mixed Reality. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering. Cham: Springer.
Quintero, M. S., Georgopoulos, A., Stylianidis, E., Lerma, J. L. & Remondino, F. (2017). CIPA’s Mission: Digitally Documenting Cultural Heritage. APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology, 48(4), 51–54.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniela Oreni
DISEGNARECON
ISSN 1828 5961
Registration at L'Aquila Law Court no 3/15 on 29th June, 2015.
Indexed in SCOPUS. Diamond Open Access. All papers are subjected to double blind peer review process by qualified reviewers.
Journal founded by Roberto Mingucci